Test Run
Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts is quite the enigmatic figure. There have been all kinds of reports, news stories and inquiries about the possibility that the U.S. presidential election of 2004 was stolen, but Kerry doesn't seem indignant about that possibility, and he waged no protest in the aftermath of the election, though his vice presidential running mate reportedly wanted to challenge the results. Kerry has either been strangely silent or the news about any disgruntlement on his part isn't getting out much; we suspect the former. It has been widely reported that Kerry was leading in exit polls, generally, on Election Day, 2004, and also that there were several flagrant election incongruities in the State of Ohio, where the election was ultimately decided, yet Kerry, who could have made legal challenges with his ample campaign bankroll and commanded legions of supporters to protest the election, did nothing. There was a little fight about the election in the U.S. House of Representatives the following January, but it didn't come to much. It was all very strange, not even a whiff of an Ukrainian-style Orange Revolution; after all, people will not get worked up about an election if the candidate that was alledgedly wronged is himself or herself disinterested. Regarding the exit polls in '04, we believe that it was remarked by prominent election analysts that this was the first election where the exit polls for a presidential election were way off.
This is just a hypothesis, but we wonder if the probable stolen election in the G.O.P. primary for U.S. Representative in the 9th Congressional District of Washington in '04 was a test run for the much larger prize that would come about a couple of months later, the presidency itself? We think, though we're not quite certain, that high government officials today are on the trail of the election thieves, apparently the statute of limitations has not run out everywhere, especially if violations of election laws have occurred since that very strange election year of 2004.
Irregularities of the 2004 Presidential Election (please, see report by Verified Voting Foundation in the following link): http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?id=5590
[revised on 2/8/11]
Please, request a petition page to Mark@partyofcommons.com and get 2 - 10 signatures for Mark's campaign for Director of Elections in King Co., or contribute to campaign: click on the title link above and make selections of how you want to donate, or send check or money order to P.O. Box 612, Bellevue, WA 98009. Thank you!
Copyright 2008 - 2011, Party of Commons TM, Good Orthodox Party of Commons TM, Democracy/Commons TM & Commons Party TM
Note: Juxtaposition of phrases on search engines may be misleading.
This is just a hypothesis, but we wonder if the probable stolen election in the G.O.P. primary for U.S. Representative in the 9th Congressional District of Washington in '04 was a test run for the much larger prize that would come about a couple of months later, the presidency itself? We think, though we're not quite certain, that high government officials today are on the trail of the election thieves, apparently the statute of limitations has not run out everywhere, especially if violations of election laws have occurred since that very strange election year of 2004.
Irregularities of the 2004 Presidential Election (please, see report by Verified Voting Foundation in the following link): http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?id=5590
[revised on 2/8/11]
Please, request a petition page to Mark@partyofcommons.com and get 2 - 10 signatures for Mark's campaign for Director of Elections in King Co., or contribute to campaign: click on the title link above and make selections of how you want to donate, or send check or money order to P.O. Box 612, Bellevue, WA 98009. Thank you!
Copyright 2008 - 2011, Party of Commons TM, Good Orthodox Party of Commons TM, Democracy/Commons TM & Commons Party TM
Note: Juxtaposition of phrases on search engines may be misleading.
Comments